“Theory, Practice, and the Bridge Between The Methods Course
and Reflective Rhetoric”
“That prospective teachers often bring with them a model of
a teacher they want to be, their favorite teacher or the one they wished they’d
had.” This is very interesting and very true, in my opinion.
“Question: Do “better” students tend to favor a particular
kind of model? Do all models require revision?” I think “successful” students
have learning / self-teaching models of their own that help them adapt to the
models of their teachers. Knowing yourself as a learner is an invaluable skill
that many students do not possess; more importantly, I do not believe students
are encouraged to learn about themselves in this way. I think schools are more
interested in dictating what needs to be done to take time out and explain that
not every model works for every students, no matter how good it may be. Instead
it’s more of a “if you don’t get it, then you are dumb and that’s nobody’s
problem but your own” kind of mentality.
“That better students tend to focus on the curriculum and
the students; weaker ones tend to focus on themselves.” This makes sense; it is
difficult to consider a / the bigger picture when you are still struggling with
the smaller one.
“Question: what activities, what questions can help weaker
students move outside the self? Or is there, in fact, a way to accelerate such
readiness?” I think this readiness comes from a better understanding of the
material. I don’t think it is a matter of introspectiveness, but rather a
matter of basic skill acquisition. Sure there are things teachers can do to
help a student, but there are no epiphany inducing questions that can speed up
the process. It’s all about the bigger picture. But in the case of weaker
learners, it is more like a puzzle. Each lesson/ objective is a puzzle piece.
The bigger picture won’t matter to you until you figure out where this piece is supposed to go.
“That in many ways this course is an exercise in identity
and identification.” Probably also some internalization and motivation
examination as well.
“this takes the form of wanting to replicate another
teacher, or seeing a student so much as a version of an earlier self of ours
that we can’t see the student in any other way” I think the assumption that a lot of teachers are replicating a past personal experience is at least moderately sound, however, I don't like the implication here that this desire to "redo the past, but in a better way" blinds teachers from seeing their students as individuals.
“Question: What other kinds of reflection should we include?
Toward what end?” I think that refection is so vague that any kind suffices.
“When reflection “works,” it raises as many questions as it
answers, perhaps more” isn’t that the whole point to reflection in the first
place?
I feel the talk of her students was drawn out and didn’t
really help prove her points. I think she could have reduced the length of this
chapter and still gotten her message across (especially that bit of “fluff”
about the weather and her students typing). However, I felt she raised some
good questions. I think I would have liked to see her own answers to these
questions, but they were good enough on their own that they got me thinking as
well.
No comments:
Post a Comment